I’ve heard your complaints.
You can’t keep up with the daily blog posts. In particular,
the endlessly discursive navel-gazing essays exhaust you. (Am I writing about
beer? God? Insanity? Adolescent crushes? Showtunes? No one can tell.)
It’s all too much, even for my mother. (My daughter only
reads the ones where her name appears.)
When will the deluge end?
When will the deluge end?
Last summer, when the Muse took a few weeks off, I observed
that my favorite author Jane Duncan used a planting-and-harvesting metaphor for the writing process:
Writing is like farming. But a very specific kind of farming, one you
might see on a small nineteenth-century family farm. Something you
could imagine hearing about on Prairie Home Company – but only if Garrison
Keillor was raised Mormon and/or Scottish. Funny, pale-skinned, but
much bleaker. …
Maybe Victorian agricultural metaphors
have become outdated, like colonialism and sonnets. As those crackpot
scientists warned us, global climate change destabilizes all kinds of formerly
reliable cycles. Patterns become less predictable and more varied.
It may be time to suspend belief in any muse whose inspiration
cycle relies on the old Farmer’s Almanac. Instead, I’ve settled on hydraulic flow as the primary metaphor for the writing process. So what's with the current flood?
Visualize the beginning of the water cycle. You’re inside a
cloud, high on a forested slope. In the background you hear the traditional
closing theme for the Mormon Tabernacle Choir's weekly radio broadcast:
"As the Dew from Heaven Distilling." Ideas are coming together in beautiful psychedelic patterns.
The MoTab song actually is a mashup with Seattle’s pioneering LGBT
youth choir Diverse Harmony. Just as the queer kids finish singing “Soon it’s Gonna Rain,” you and your friends find yourself in
an inviting taproom. The perfectly-brewed final product arrives: an array of refreshing literary beverages pouring out of fizzy brass kegs. Jazz pianist Jacky Terrason plays “Smile.”
In between the initial dew and the final tankard, you were treated to the kind of
misty streams-and-pipes montage you’d see in a Coors commercial. Writing is a beautiful
thing.
Montages are misleading.
When I started exploring this Writer thing, I didn’t realize
the writing process involved such a complicated Rube Goldberg contraption. Before the final product pours out, that initial idea has to pass through a lot of creaky gears and leaky pipes. With numerous opportunities for blockages and buildups.
What have I learned about the writing process so far? Besides the occasional need to let out a burst of steam? [Ed. Note: or flood the market.]
I've figured out you can’t stand out drenched out in the brainstorm forever, shaking
your fists at the gods like King Lear. Words need to start appearing on the
screen. Eventually.
And they will. Eventually.
Also, you’ll never finish anything if you endlessly nano-edit every single phrase, like Phil Hartman’s anal-retentive chef on Saturday Night Live. And so on.
And they will. Eventually.
Also, you’ll never finish anything if you endlessly nano-edit every single phrase, like Phil Hartman’s anal-retentive chef on Saturday Night Live. And so on.
As it turns out, each stage and sub-stage of the musing/ organizing/ writing/
editing /repeat process is equally important. You have to resist the temptation
of favouritism. I say that not just as a writer, but also as a parent. A parent
who has learned to respond to every conceivable kind of explosion in the same
equally loving and hopeful way.
For example, one writerly theme I expect to return to is the formerly-paralyzing dilemma of how to divide a foaming batch of words. Mititosis, meiosis,
distillation, osmosis, etc., all have their pros and cons. For now, I’ll just leave you with the observation that stress is
sexy. At least for yeast.
And I'll reveal the word of the month: sluice.
Today our sluice is not a filter, however. It’s a cascading rapid.
On the other hand, at many stages, the writing process is more like a
gooey sticky juggernaut.
No doubt I’ll be sharing details about some of these writing
lessons soon.
I expect we’ll resume a normal-ish publishing pace any day now. I'm hoping for something along the lines of “bidiurnal,” i.e., every two days. In the meantime, the burst of daily literary activity has given me the opportunity for some useful stress testing.
Don't worry when I finally skip a day of publishing, or a week. Or whatever. In the past, the inspiration to write was very fragile. Virtually anything would bring production to a shrieking halt. In particular, certain stuff – including my quixotic legal battles – inevitably resulted in PTSD triggers. Fortunately, as I reported yesterday, life is much better these days. I’m confident I’ll continue writing and publishing. Confident and hopeful.
I expect we’ll resume a normal-ish publishing pace any day now. I'm hoping for something along the lines of “bidiurnal,” i.e., every two days. In the meantime, the burst of daily literary activity has given me the opportunity for some useful stress testing.
Don't worry when I finally skip a day of publishing, or a week. Or whatever. In the past, the inspiration to write was very fragile. Virtually anything would bring production to a shrieking halt. In particular, certain stuff – including my quixotic legal battles – inevitably resulted in PTSD triggers. Fortunately, as I reported yesterday, life is much better these days. I’m confident I’ll continue writing and publishing. Confident and hopeful.
Besides, the example of all these flakey millennials has REDUCED my anxiety level. When no one else bothers to match his socks, meet deadlines, or
respond to emails, why should I be burdened with perfectionism?
Other essays from "Roger On Writing":
“Watch for Quiet Explosions” (10/15/19)
“Indoor Plumbing” (12/14/18)
“Blaming the Children” (9/21/18)
“Indoor Plumbing” (12/14/18)
“Blaming the Children” (9/21/18)
“Lilies That Fester” (3/25/18)
“Letting off Steam” (12/21/17)
“Super Fuzzy Things” (9/8/17)
“Dear Reader” (7/22/17)
No comments:
Post a Comment